The world is a dangerous place, and contrary to what many Obama loyalists believe, the Obama administration has already proven it is incapable of handle one issue effectively, let alone several issues at a time.
In a mere four months, the Obama administration has mishandled every one of the real and imamate threats that loom all around us. Nuclear weapons in Iran and North Korea (as well as the missile systems to delivery them), Venezuela's massive military build up (thanks to Iran, Cuba, Russia, and China), pirates still zipping around the Red Sea, Afghanistan and Pakistan torn apart by the Taliban…and now Russia's push to weaken NATO:
President Obama Must Not Concede to Russian Demands over NATO
So many threats, so little time. But if we handle just one of the crisis' in a manner that sets a tone of confidence, it will not only send a message to those that would do us harm, but reassure our allies that America is still the dominate force for good in the world.
As President Obama concludes the second leg of his worldwide apology tour, there are many in the world concerned about the leadership void that will be created with Obama’s laze-faire approach to foreign policy. But just as Margret Thatcher did in the late 70’s, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper seems prepared to take a stronger leadership role in the world while the United States of America struggles with its identity crisis.
Canada Fills Obama's Leadership Void
Some in the United States choose to forget that not only has Canada been a great friend and neighbor, but also a country committed to our shared security. Minister Harper is more than capable, and thank God he is prepared to pick up the shield and the sword that is needed to ensure a free and safe world.
A Mari Usque Ad Mare
It was only a matter time before the fascist Left got their way. Many on the Left are nothing more than cowards that hide behind a justice system held captive to a mob mentality:
Only in a country that considers bullfighting a fair fight (I believe the bull might take exception to that), would this type of action be considered a cause for truth and justice. Please………..
A Pennsylvania company that participated in the preparation of Marine One, the designation for the Presidential helicopter fleet, discovered that blueprints for the helicopter design have been passed onto an IP address in Iran:
Fox News: Marine One Security Breach
America has enemies, and possession of theses plans by a terrorist nation such as Iran is a grieve menace to the leadership of our country. This incident is a grime reminder that regardless who our President is, there are those in the world whose continued existence will always be a threat to our security.
Given this recent intrusion, what should be America’s response?
Hamas is up to its old tricks, and once again most of the world is calling on Israel to show restraint, or is looking to America to “intervene.” But what many in the world are forgetting is that Israel is not the aggressor, and it is simple defending itself against an enemy so vile that it would hide like cowards amongst women and children. Israel has stated that this battle will be to the “bitter end,” with the ultimate goal being the destruction of Hamas. Good riddance.
Hamas is not a group of freedom fighters. Hamas is a terror-based organization whose objective is two-fold: the total destruction of the State of Israel and the establishment of a fundamentalist Islamic republic. We are not dealing here with objections by Israel or the West; we are dealing with the fundamental approach and biased declarations of Hamas leaders.
Many news reports are depressingly familiar in that simple facts are twisted, holding Israel responsible for all of the ills of the Middle East while declining to hold Palestinians accountable for their own decisions, which consequential have lead to many of their misfortunes.
Washington Times: Israel Postures to Reshape "Truce"
Zionist Mass Murder: Break the Siege, Defend Gaza!
Reuters: Iran sets up court to try Israelis over Gaza
The Palestine’s have chosen terrorist as their leaders, and have willing accepted an evil alliance with Iran. America’s support of Israel is based on the fact that both Israel and the United States are freely elected democracies, both are fighting for human rights and both are fighting terrorism. The world would be a far better place if Hamas was wiped from the map, which in turn would help to diminish Iran's influence in region.
The threat of Islamic terrorist has not been a major component of this year's election, especially as of late. Much of the focus has been on the economy and Governor Palin's lipstick, one more deserving than the other.
Probably feeling somewhat slighted that no one was paying attention to their "noble cause in the name of Allah," the US Embassy in Yemen (the ancestral home of Osama bin Laden) was hit:
Voice of America: US Embassy Attacked
This should be the lead story on the news, but it will not be. It is in the best interest of Democrat PR machine (ABC, CBS, NBC, and MSNBC) to downplay the continued attacks on the US, just as they did by under reporting America's success in Iraq. The simple truth is that the terrorist attacks on America continue, and some would prefer to "engage" America in conversations that promote class warfare and partisan politics.
Newsweek: Pushing Russia’s Buttons
Leave it to the media to sit on the sidelines and immediately find someway to blame America. I particular like Hirsch’s statement – “Putin's invasion of Georgia is unforgivable.” If you wait long enough, along comes the “but monkey” – (Hirsch’s statement continues) “But let's face it: the West helped to provoke Moscow's aggression.”
Saying the West provoked Russia is like blaming the rape victim for the rape. How dare Georgia flaunt democracy and liberty like some sort of freedom “hussy.” What was Russia to do, just sit there and let Georgia go on governing themselves? Well, as a matter of fact…yes.
What Hirsch, as well as many others seem to be missing is that Russia is only reacting on instinct; an instinct of oppression and brutality. Many in the media seem to be just realizing that the Bear is back, and it’s hungry. But a year ago I warned of Russia’s forthcoming aggression:
Putin on the Ritz: The Evil Empire Never Went Away
Maybe the West is to blame to some degree, but not for the reasons stated by many. The West turned its back on the Bear believing it to an impotent, only to turn back around and find a sleeker, but no less dangerous Bear. The West forgot the lessons of the past, we forgot the words of Ronald Reagan:
Presidential Candidate Barrack Obama appeared before another enthusiastic crowd in Powder Springs, Georgia, where he could be heard complaining about English-only policies. Obama told the audience that Americans should be “embarrassed” that most of us don’t speak a second language, in particular Spanish.
Sounding more like a contestant on “The Last Comic Standing,” he even mocked some American’s inability to speak French by stating “all we’s can say is “Merci beaucoup (in a flat, sarcastic tone):”
Obama" " Your kids should be learning Spanish."
This speech received NO major media attention, but when Phil Gramm stated that America has become a nation of whiners, it is the lead story with every major, Left leaning media outlet. But what does it matter, because like Obama has done so many times before, he needed to come out later to “clarify,” his comments:
First off Mr. Obama, what language is “we’s?” Secondly, American’s have nothing to be embarrassed about. What was embarrassing was watching the crowd you were talking down to in Powder Springs laugh and clap as you insulted them. This whole speech reeked of elitism, and you came off as very arrogant.
The truth is that when business people from around the world gather for a meeting, lets say in France, they are speaking English; I know, because I am in those meetings. The reality is that English is the business language of the WORLD. And until America freely surrenders it leadership in the world, English will continue to be the universal language for prosperity. The exception to that rule, large cities in the United States, such as Miami:
In Miami, Spanish is the primary language
A major city in the United States is now divided because of language, and to quote President Lincoln, “a house divided against itself cannot stand.” Language is a dividing factor of a culture; if we cannot communicate, we cannot be united. Want ads after want ads in Miami insist that the applicant must speak Spanish. If immigrants are learning our language Mr. Obama, please explain to us what is happening in Miami, as well as other major cities in America.
It is important to remember that not all Europeans speak a second language, in particular English, I know because I lived in Europe for five-years. There are many immigrants, mostly Hispanic, that are not assimilating into the American culture. Don’t believe me? Then why do I see Spanish signs everywhere I go, and I live in New Hampshire, where there is less than a 1% minority population. Or why do States such as California and Massachusetts have to spend millions to print most of their State forms in Spanish? And tell me why the number one radio station in LA is a Spanish speaking station.
English only laws help take immigrants out of the shadows, breaking down the barrier that is stopping many of them from succeeding in the United States, the inability to speak English. The answer has never been, nor should it ever be, for “Americans” to learn another language, but for immigrants to embrace their new home, and unite through one common language, English. Many immigrants (especially illegal) are not interjecting themselves into the American culture because we have failed to stay true to the promise of the American dream. The lack of wiliness not to learn the English language is supported by a subculture within the borders of our own country that encourages them to remain separate, a “house divided.”
Obama’s team is always thinking about the next photo-op, and his upcoming trip to Europe is no exception. In an effort to hearken back to the great speeches made by President Reagan (President Reagan: Tear Down this Wall) and John F. Kennedy during their visits to Germany, Obama has asked permission to give a speech in front of the Brandenburg Gate:
Merkel uneasy over Obama Brandenburg Gate address
Merkel is right. When President Reagan appeared before the gate, he gave a speech based on integrity. And when President Reagan uttered the words “tear down this wall (against the advice of his staff),” he meant it. The Democrats have a short memory regarding Reagan’s Brandenburg speech, because many of them criticized Reagan for his “tough tone,” referring to him as a “Cowboy.” Now, along comes the polar opposite of President Reagan, Obama, hoping to capitalize on a speech he most likely condemned while a student at Columbia.
Obama only needs to show up in Europe to receive an enthusiastic reception. Socialist can smell a fellow Socialist from across the ocean. In the crowd will be the usually Leftist holding their signs referring to President Bush as “Hitler,” and Obama will stand there smiling. Obama will explain how America under George Bush has failed the Europeans, and that when he is elected, Europeans will be equal partners with America. In doing so, Obama will ignore the fact that most European nations have been complaisant regarding the War on Terror, and that we are truly the only Super Power in the World at this point, something that infuriates the Europeans too no end.
Of course Obama is no President Reagan or Kennedy, but Obama will use “just words” to wow his audience. Expect to hear quotes from Reagan and JFK, to the thunderous applause of a pack audience of Progressive Europeans. And in the end, the Europeans will know no more about Senator Obama’s policies than we do.
Iran missile test 'provocative'
And what was Obama’s response, “stronger sanctions:”
Obama, McCain split on Iran's missile tests
Obama - “Iran must suffer threats of economic sanctions with direct diplomacy opening up channels of communication so we avoid provocation, but we give strong incentives for the Iranians to change their behavior."
Rebel was featured on a crime stopper post card sent Muslims in the Scottish district of Tayside are outraged by the appearance of a wide-eyed, pup on postcards distributed by the local police force, according to the Daily Mail.
The cute cards were meant to notify locals of a new non-emergency telephone number, but instead have become a flashpoint for a clash of cultures. Shopkeepers are refusing to display the offending ad and a Dundee city councilor is calling for an investigation:
I Am Just A Little Dog...Get Over It!
My favorite quote - "My concern was that it's not welcomed by all communities, with the dog on the cards," said Dundee councilor Mohammed Asif, according to the Daily Mail. Really, Rebel, the little puppy, who also will be serving these same people in the line of duty? Lunacy!
Who in the story is being intolerant? Rebel right now is a cute little dog, but will soon be a member of law enforcement, which will command respect from everyone in the neighborhood he will be serving. To consider Rebel to be “ritually unclean” takes a religious belief too far. Rebel is a symbol of the type of political correctness that can drive a wedge into a community, which should not be tolerated.
As for the Muslims offended by Rebel, don't worry. God forbid you are ever in need of police assistance, Rebel, the ritually unclean animal, will serve you without prejudice when he is called upon.
For those that do not know Mark Steyn, he is an extraordinary author, whose honest writings are as witty as they are insightful. But more importantly Mr. Steyn is a true Conservative, and that seems to bother some people.
Mr. Steyn has found himself in a bit of “legal” problem in Canada for an article that he wrote for MacLean’s magazine (which was an extract from Mark Steyn’s brilliant book “America Alone”). Mr. Steyn is unapologetic of his observations of radical Islam, nor should he be, because every word written in the original article (as well as his other pieces) is true. But as with the United States, there are those on the Left that would prefer to silence the voices of reason instead of confronting the truth of the words. Mark Steyn is their latest target.
The Canadian Islamic Council filed a grievance with the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal. The Tribunal a three-person committee comprised of lawyers. The Canadian Islamic Council received support from Canadian Arab Federation, the Canadian Civil Liberties Associations, and the Canadian Association of Journalists. Progressive groups have used the Tribunal to try and silence all manner of free speech merely on the grounds that they disagree with it. For you see, the Left often feels that if they strongly disagree with another person’s opinion, it must be offensive, and that in itself merits censorship. But of course that same principal cannot be directed at those on the Left.
It is hard to believe that a country that would allow the release of a movie about the assassination of President Bush would have a problem with any speech. But hypocrisy is a trademark characteristic of those on the Left.
It will be interesting to see how this all turns out. The only thing at stake is the exchange of honest ideas, which doesn't seem to fit into this Politically Correct world that we have allowed ourselves to be painted into.
Posts
All Comments
